Friday, August 10, 2007

Responsibility? – $100 million CEOs – What a bunch of spoiled brats

I know some are really hurting financially right now. The markets are tanking. Well, not really. The Dow is still above 13,000. It is still up about 6% in 2007 and 30% since late 2005. If you were to listen to the “important people” you would think the world has come to the end. If the economic measuring stick is still up from the beginning of the year why are all these CEOs and Wall Street boys crying,

The end of the world is coming!

Simply because the “most intelligent” people in America, the ones who are “worth” $100 million salaries, made bad choices, ran their businesses into the ground and are paying the price for lack of basic understanding of economic policy. These foolish individuals, who are “worth” $100 million salaries, have broken every rule of business 101. They are about to lose a great deal of money because they have chosen to create procedures instead of paying for experienced employees.

These CEOs, who are “worth” $100 million salaries, lobbied to change the bankruptcy rules so that poor individuals who had their jobs outsourced have no chance to start over. The corporate cry babies do not want to take responsibility for their actions. These CEOs want a government bailout. The FED must lower rates. The FED must increase liquidity. These CEOs are having a brief glimpse of what the rest of the country has been living for the past 5 years. They want a bailout and the bad thing is that the FED is bailing them out by injecting liquidity. Increased liquidity means increased inflation, the thing the FED is supposed to fight. The FED will most likely help them even further by decreasing the FED FUNDS rate.

This will decrease, even further, the value of the dollar bringing ever more inflation since the US produces only 18% of what it consumes.

Why is the FED going against its mandate and bailing out a bunch of cry babies?
Why is the FED breaking every rule of stabile economic policy, sacrificing economic stability to save the butts of a few individuals who speculated on an obviously overheating and inflated housing market?

One can only imagine but I would put money on it that the definition of collusion and corruption would somehow be appropriate.

The fact is we are arriving at a turning point where all of the negative aspects of Reaganomics will come to haunt us. The piper must be paid. Stop gaps do nothing but increase the problem. Many of the cry babies have talked about 1930s type depression. They believe that it will be due to FED not doing what they want. We are heading toward a depression because we will not take a serious look at our economy and our culture. Since we will not look at the problems we will not take them on before they take on us.

Tags:

Labels: , , ,

2 Comments:

Blogger Lexcen said...

A CEO who gets $100M begs the question of whether he is worth it. Would a corporation flounder if their CEO only earned half that amount? I know that CEO's have a contract to get so many millions prior to getting their hands on the wheel. How do you evaluate someone as being worth $10M for example? Do they have a proven track record? Or are they the best salesman at selling themselves?

11:43 PM  
Blogger Small Business USA said...

Lexcen No CEO is worth 100 million / year. No CEO is worth 5 million / year. To be worth 1 million a year they would have to personally increase (that is on top of what the business would do in the normal corse of operations) the company's business by 10 million.

The articles shows that while the mega salaries are paid to do shareholder's interests they are not doing the company's interest. The company pays them not the shareholders (fine line but toward the thinking that a juridic entity has several constituents not just shareholders).

Unfortunately these CEOs are not worth 100K.

5:49 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home