Wednesday, November 22, 2006

Do you Believe Government Data on the Economy?

I have the opportunity to stay constantly updated on the various data sets that the government puts out every month. I am always amazed at the huge adjustments made on the previous month’s data and how data is manipulated during political battles. Whether the battle be for the elections or some law the congress and administrations want to pass. Look at the data provided when the last Amnesty law was passed under Regan. The Regan Administration estimated that there were 2.5 million illegal immigrants. When all was said and done that number became 4.5 million individual, without considering spouses, children and others who then became eligible for citizenship.

The most recent example is the Bush Administration’s data on GDP. In May the government revised upward its estimates of 2006 GDP to 5.3%. This week the same Government indicated that 2006 GDP will be just over 3% and 2007 GDP will be just under 3%. Strangely enough just after the elections the government realized that our country is growing at 50% of the rate it had indicated just 6 months earlier. I am not saying that our government, paid for by you and me, is lying to us. Perhaps they are just terribly incompetent.

There are those who continue to say that the US is the #1 economy in the world. That the entire world would like to be the US, yet our immigration arrives only from third world countries. The government says that unemployment is 4.4%. At 4.4% everyone who wants a job, has a job. What are you complaining about Joe Worker? Get a job!

I propose that the data provided by the government and so widely pimped by politicians is worth less than cow manure. You can use cow manure to fertilize land and in some cases it can be a fuel source but data like this is misleading and in some cases just plain false. My opponents will immediately ask, “Why would the government lie to us?” Simply, if they provide official data that the economy is good then you and me, Joe Worker, when we are working at a job that pays ½ the salary as 5 years ago, well we are just unlucky or unqualified.

How do we see when the governmental data is bullhonkey? Look at what is going on around you. Last month Toyota opened a new plant in Texas, for 2,000 jobs they received 110,000 applications. That should tell you that labor markets are flush with supply and very little demand. An easier verification of the strength of the job market is looking at employer’s job offers. You can see them on many different job sites. If you see a company looking for a degree in Business Administration for an office manager then you know that labor markets are extremely flush. If you see companies doing credit checks on employees then labor markets are extremely flush. If you see your salary stagnating over a 5 year period, less than a 10% increase after adjusting for inflation, the labor markets are extremely flush.

This same concept can be applied to everything the government proposes. From immigration to public debt, the most valuable indicator is what is happening around you. As for the question that the US is the number 1 economy in the world and globalization is a good thing and the trade deficit does not matter, the best indicator is the Dollar / Euro exchange. In 1998, $0.79 bought 1 Euro, today it takes $1.30 to buy 1 Euro. It seems to me that the European market is doing better than the US.

So why is all of this important?
The best way to control a people and strip it of its rights is to keep the people in the dark. If you do not know better you think this is normal and you will accept your fate and be content allowing the politicians to live the fat life on your back. Talking points and governmental data and studies are the book burnings of the emperor class. Our politicians must keep us in the dark so that they can move ahead with their private agenda. We can stop them. All we have to do is look at what is happening around us and turn off the noise from the politicians.

Tags:

Labels: , , , ,

7 Comments:

Blogger Leo said...

Good info. to know, thanks.

12:54 PM  
Blogger Small Business USA said...

Leo Thank you. Happy Thanksgiving to all.

8:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

David, I cannot comment on the US scene. I do trust the Australian Bureau of Statistics as statistics within the bounds set by the approach.

There are two issues here.

The first is the structure used in collecting the data. In Australia, for example, the unemployment stats, while accurate in statistical terms, understate real unemployment because of the assumptions used.

The second is that statistics are averages, figures across an area. So while Australian employment stats show great growth, try telling that to someone in Western Sydney who is struggling to get a job.

As you know, my argument in all these things is the need to test with facts and to test the so-called facts themselves.

12:55 AM  
Blogger Small Business USA said...

Jim My point exactly. I think the difference is in our expectations.

While you accept the info as reliable under the auspices of the how the information works, I say it is unreliable and if you know you cannot get it right do not publish it just for political purposes.

I also believe the information is skewed to always show things better than they really are. All govt. are self-serving, feeding entities that want to grow. Good things allow them to grow more than bad things.

The examples are many but just think of two white guys in shirts and ties going up to an individual of hispanic decent and asking, "are you an illegal alien?"

The guy, no matter what his status, is going to say that he is here properly. The same holds true for unemployment, spending, contracts, orders.

I believe we need to see things as they really are in order to make appropriate decisions. Without reality we are just the blind leading the blind.

5:13 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

David, we are in disagreement, I think, at least so far as official Australian stats collected by the ABS are concerned. There is no political interference in the normal collection and estimating process.

You are, of course, right in your broader point about the way in which the presentation and interpretation of data is distorted.

Take the official stats example. Both sides of politics will sieze on features that support their position. So the stats may be okay within the bounds set by the collection method, but subsequent discussion may be distorted.

One thing that may be different between Australia and the US is the level of economic literacy in this country.

It is some years since I was in the US. Then I was surprised at how little reporting there was in the ordinary press on both economic and international issues. In Australia the main stream media carries economic reporting and analysis - not just comments on the stock exchange - on a daily basis as part of main stream news.

The number of often highly knowledgeable economics reporters, together with the presence of economic consultancies and think tanks who also comment, sometimes makes for a remarkably well informed debate.

In these circumstances the capacity to distort and then get away with it is reduced.

12:42 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Jim I am not aware of the situation in Australia. One day I hope to visit and learn more.

In the US, I do not think that there is tampering in the actual getting the data. I think the method is defined in a way that allows interpretation according to the moment.

Let me explain. A publicly traded company supplies quarterly data. This data, for about 60% is not real data but is extrapolated. Generally the longer a single method is used the better the reporting.

The same thing happens with govt. provided data. They gather some pieces, then it is interpretted, and the following month is revised.

It is the interpretation part I have a problem with.

After that the politicians also pick and choose the things they think support their arguments.

Let's take unemployment. In Europe the data is exact, because Europe has a worker registration card and a company must register every person it hires/fires. Each citizen has an ID card. This means that the government data can be off only by minimal amounts.

In the US there is none of this. Everything is based on telephone polls and companies supplying data, remember these are the same companies that estimate their quarterly earnings.

Unfortunately, I have to say that Govt. data in the US is at best a joke. Today more revisions, obviously to the downside on last months data. This about GDP non the less!

3:57 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

David, I look forward to the time you and Raffaella visit Australia.

I think that you would find the differences between the two countries fascinating. When you come, you see I am being positive, I think that we can set up a visit that will give you a real feel for Australian variety and complexity. And probably make it tax deductable as well.

On stats, we seem to be heading towards a convergance of views.

6:05 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home