Monday, October 01, 2007

Why are politicians so adamantly pushing illegal immigration? Could the supporters be Racist?

Why would our politicians support illegal immigration? What are their motives for creating amnesty? Supporters will say that it is the humane thing to do. They do not want to separate families. Under this assumption we should no longer imprison mothers or fathers who commit crimes. We should not imprison sons, daughters, brothers or sisters. If we apply the entire immigration debate we should not imprison cousins, aunts or uncles of US citizens.

Some will say these illegal immigrants are only looking for a better life, doing jobs Americans will not do. This argument holds as much water as pasta colander. There are no jobs Americans will not do. Perhaps they will not do some jobs as slave labor or move to an area for a short period of time to work for minimum wage but all jobs have an equilibrium price. More importantly, why have we decided that illegal immigrants from Mexico and South America should get these jobs? What about the millions of refugees from around the world? How about the famine stricken African countries? Would these people not do the same jobs, perhaps for less money?

Politicians are not the brightest tools in the shed. They see that numerically the US is losing the battle of numbers. The European Union now counts 30% citizens and a larger GDP than the US. China’s population dwarfs the US. India is moving quickly up the “number of citizens” totem pole. US politicians believe that allowing savage immigration will help them remain important on the world stage. Even China understands that there must be balance between population and resources. China has enacted strict 1 child per couple laws in order to reduce its population.

That still does not answer why politicians want Mexicans and South Americans. Poorly educated people have more children and are easier to influence politically. Our neighbors to the border are primarily Christian. Our politicians think this is manna from heaven. Hispanics are preferable to Arabs, Slavs, Orientals, Africans and Europeans. Our politicians believe these are the perfect slaves to be preyed upon by the corporate and political machines without creating significant cultural changes. Simply said they are racist. All of those promoting amnesty without supporting free open borders from all nations are racist. They believe Mexican and Southern American Immigrants are better than anyone else.

Every time you hear that comedian knocking on the anti amnesty groups ask yourself if he makes the same type of statements supporting the refugees from Africa. Whenever you hear the LULAC or ACLU speak ask yourself, “Are they doing the same thing for immigrants from Burma or Darfur?” If you cannot say that they would support these other peoples then they are RACIST.

Tags:


Labels: , , , , ,

3 Comments:

Blogger Steve Nizer said...

Thanks for the comment on my blog. I think you've really touched on something here. Alot of pro-immigration groups have a vested interested in rapid demographic change. Or, simply put, they don't care if people jump the fence (literally). Although I'm a McCain guy, he has been pretty awful on immigration.

7:11 PM  
Blogger Lexcen said...

West Germany had a policy of allowing immigrants into their country in the seventies to provide a source of unskilled labor but didn't allow them to attain citizenship. It was a means to cheap labor from neighboring poor countries. Similarly Australia encouraged immigration from Europe in the fifties to supply an unskilled labor force for the manufacturing industry.
I think that either America is in need of a large supply of cheap unskilled labor or there is another unknown agenda at work.

3:10 AM  
Blogger Small Business USA said...

Steve I enjoy reading your blog.

Lexcen I think it is more of the growth agenda. America is aging and becoming more educated. Both are factors that limit internal population growth.

6:40 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home