Hillary Clinton, unable to debate the Illegal Immigration, calling names

We remember arguments when we were children. Whenever one side starting losing the battle name calling would become the primary defense. Liar, Liar Pants on fire! Fatso, ugly, stupid, dummy are just a few the defense mechanisms employed regularly by children. But what do we do when a Presidential candidate starts calling names?

Hillary Clinton cannot defend her position of Amnesty for criminal aliens so what does she do? She attacks one of the mouthpieces for the majority of Americans.

“We cannot fix the problem by blowing hot air like some TV commentators.”

Obviously fixing the problem for Ms. Clinton means throwing up your arms and submitting to the will of millions of criminals. Extrapolating this would mean that if 20 million Americans decided it was ok to hold up a bank for money, Ms Clinton would want to fix the problem by making it legal for any American to walk into a bank and demand money. It is also obvious that our prisons could not hold another 20 million Americans so we also need to pardon all those who had committed the crime in the past. We could call it Comprehensive Monetary Distribution Reform.

Ms. Clinton’s position for Amnesty is not defendable because these individuals have broken the law. There is no discussion. Whether or not we think the law is stupid, these individuals are criminals. Ms. Clinton would do better to say as much. Her statement could be, “These individuals are criminals. Our future policy will open the US borders removing Homeland Security controls. In light of our removing VISA and Immigration regulations these individuals no longer should be prosecuted since we no longer have immigration legislation.”

Stating that any individual “blows hot air” is childish. More importantly Ms. Clinton is a successful lawyer. I doubt that she would use such rhetoric when arguing before a Judge. This can only means that she believes Americans are childish or of limited cultural capabilities. When thinking about who will lead us into the serious changes of the next 10 years, we must consider these things. Do we really want someone as President that may respond, during a world wide crisis, “don’t listen to them, they are ugly.”